S2 Episode 43: Can a Public University Stay Politically Neutral? with Ed Seidel | Ed Seidel
At a moment when public trust in higher education is faltering and “diversity” has become a politically charged word, University of Wyoming President Ed Seidel argues that universities must return to first principles: truth-seeking, intellectual humility, and viewpoint diversity.
Today on Heterodox Out Loud, host John Tomasi speaks with Ed Seidel about how a public land-grant university can defend free speech, uphold institutional neutrality, and navigate state pressure around DEI, without abandoning its core academic mission.
Seidel, a theoretical physicist turned university leader, explains why viewpoint diversity is not about partisan quotas, but about strengthening scholarship through rigorous disagreement. He reflects on Wyoming’s adoption of institutional neutrality, the importance of time-place-manner protections for expressive activity, and the difficult leadership decisions that followed October 7 and subsequent campus tensions. The conversation explores how public universities balance First Amendment obligations with community responsibility, why “cancel culture” is often rooted in weakened scientific norms, and how land-grant institutions uniquely serve the public through two-way engagement. Ultimately, this episode asks: How can universities rebuild public trust while remaining places of fearless inquiry?
In This Episode:
- The crisis of public trust in higher education
- Viewpoint diversity vs. partisan representation
- Institutional neutrality in practice
- DEI reform and state legislative pressure
- Free speech and expressive activity policies
- Scientific norms and intellectual humility
- The role of land-grant universities in American democracy
- Leadership during campus controversy
Related Podcasts
Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.